CSPA
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
“Conserving California’s Fisheries"

Home

More News

"Although the fishing groups represented the wishes of the voters, the water agencies had the dollars, the same dollars that pour into legislator's coffers during election campaigns."

Jerry Neuburger, CSPA Webmaster

Your 501(c)(3) tax deductible cash donations are desperately needed if the fight for our fisheries is to continue. Read how you can donate!

More News

horizontal rule

CSPA News

Do You Vote? Then this is important!

AB 1806; who voted yes and who voted no, the backers and those who opposed 

By Jerry Neuburger
August 23, 2008 -- After a long campaign, AB 1806, the Delta Restoration and Mitigation Bill, finally passed through the Senate. A quick vote on the amended version by the Assembly and then on to the governor's desk for a signature and it will become law.

While its passing is cause for celebration and it contains some important provisions protecting fish in emergency situations, it falls far short of its initial goal of providing millions of dollars for fisheries restoration as mitigation for the damage done by the pumping process of the State Water Project and the Central Valley Project. 

Since the bill was initiated in the Assembly by Lois Wolk, chair of the Assembly Water, Parks and Wildlife Committee, assembly members were the first to vote on the bill's passage. CSPA asked supporters to write legislators encouraging the bill's passage. The vote split on party lines with almost all Democrats voting yes and the Republicans voting no. The recorded vote, 43-36, was;

AYES: Beall, Berg, Brownley, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, DeSaulnier, Dymally, Eng, Evans, Feuer, Fuentes, Furutani, Hancock, Hayashi, Hernandez, Huffman, Jones, Karnette, Krekorian, Laird, Leno, Levine, Lieber, Lieu, Ma, Mendoza, Mullin, Nava, Nunez, Portantino, Price, Ruskin, Salas, Saldana, Solorio, Swanson, Torrico, Wolk, Bass 

NOES: Adams, Aghazarian, Anderson, Arambula, Benoit, Berryhill, Blakeslee, Carter, Cook, DeVore, Duvall, Emmerson, Fuller, Gaines, Galgiani, Garcia, Garrick, Horton, Houston, Huff, Jeffries, Keene, La Malfa, Maze, Nakanishi, Niello, Parra, Plescia, Runner, Silva, Smyth, Spitzer, Strickland, Tran, Villines, Walters 

NO VOTE RECORDED: Soto

Once the bill reached the Senate the going became much rougher. The major water agency lobbyists started prowling the halls, misrepresenting large portions of the bill and spreading rumors that the bill's passage would mean drastic reductions of the availability of water for the southland. Even so, the bill passed through the Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee, thanks to the efforts of the committee's chair, Senator Steinberg, and through the Senate Appropriations Committee, thanks to the efforts of that committee's chair, Senator Torlakson.

However, the bill's luck ran out on the Senate floor. Not a single Republican voted for the bill. They were joined by six Democrats, four from the south state and two noted for being pro-business.

AYES: Wiggins, Migden, Machado, Steinberg, Torlakson, Yee, Peralta, Corbett, Simitian, Alquist, Scott, Cedillo, Kuehl, Romero, Ridley-Thomas, Lowenthal, Oropeza, Kehoe

NOES: Ducheny, Padilla, McLeod, Calderon, Florez, Correa, Cox, Aanestad, Denham, Cogdill, Maldonado, Runner, Ashburn, McClintock, Margett, Dutton, Ackerman, Battin, Wyland, Harman, Hollingsworth

NO VOTE RECORDED: Vincent

Senator Florez had initially voted for the bill but, when it was obvious that the bill would be defeated, changed his vote to "NO." Senator Torlakson, seeing the bill's defeat imminent, pulled the bill and asked for a re-vote at a later date. The bill was amended and stripped of its "offending" passages and then returned to the floor. With the mitigation elements removed, it was assumed that the bill would pass, 40-0 but that was not the case. 

Even with the bill stripped to the bare bones and focused solely on fish rescue, a minority of senators voted against it, all Republicans. Their reasons are unfathomable since the bill's financial impact is negligible. It appears that they REALLY are no friends of fishermen when you look at the organizations backing the bill and those groups opposed, all connected with the water lobby.

NOES: Aanestad, Margett, Ackerman, McClintock, Ashburn, Runner, Hollingsworth, Wyland 

ABSTAINING:  Battin, Cedillo, Vincent

The bill was backed by virtually every fishing organization in the state. The list on the Senate website is a who's who of the fishing community and represents tens of thousands of California anglers. The backers were:

American Sportfishing Association
Bass Classics of Santa Clara
Black Bass Action Committee
California Animal Association
California Fisheries Restoration Foundation
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
California Striped Bass Association
California Trout
Coastside Fishing Club
Crockett Striped Bass Club
Delta Fly Fishers
Diablo Valley Fly Fishermen
Fishery Foundation of California
Fly Fishers for Conservation
Fly Fishers of Davis
Friends of Butte Creek
Gold Country Fly Fishers
Granite Bay Flycasters
Grizzly Peak Flyfishers

Lower Sherman Island Duck Hunters Association
Mission Peak Fly Anglers
Natural Resources Defense Council
NORCAL Kayak Anglers
North Coast Fishermen's Association
Northern California Council, Federation of Fly Fishers
Pacific Catch
Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations
Palo Alto Flyfishers
Peninsula Fly fishers
Planning and Conservation League
Pro Troll
Recreational Fishing Alliance
San Jose Flycasters
Santa Cruz Fly Fishermen
Shasta Fly Fishers
Small Boat Commercial Salmon Fishermen Association
Tracy Fly fishers
Tri-Valley Fly Fishers
Trout Unlimited of California
United Anglers of California
United Pier & Shore Anglers of California
USA Fishing
Water for Fish
Wilderness Fly Fishers

If the advocates could be equated with the who's who of the fishing community, then the opposition, a list of the most powerful water districts in the state, could definitely be billed as the powerbrokers of the state's water. Although the fishing groups represented the wishes of the voters, the water agencies had the dollars, the same dollars that pour into legislator's coffers during election campaigns. The list of water agencies that opposed the original bill follows;

Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District Zone 7
Alameda County Water District
Association of California Water Agencies
California Municipal Utilities Association
Calleguas Municipal Water District
Castaic Lake Water Agency Coachella Valley Water District
Department of Water Resources
Desert Water Agency
Dudley Ridge Water District
East Valley Water District
Friant Water Authority
Kern County Water Agency
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Mojave Water Agency
San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District
San Diego County Water Authority
Santa Clara Valley Water District
Southern California Water Committee
 State Water Contractors, Inc.
Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District
United Water Conservation District
Valley Ag Water Coalition 
Westlands Water District